Polygamy therefore the Laws Just after Obergefell v
A majority of Justices (Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, White) was ready to realize that the physiological father has actually a freedom interest in a love along with his youngster, but Fairness Stevens voted towards plurality (Scalia, Rehnquist, O’Connor, Kennedy) because the he believed that the brand new statute under consideration acceptably safe one desire
702 See, elizabeth.g., Obergefell, slip op. at the 20 (Roberts, C.”); but get a hold of Joanna L. Grossman & Lawrence Meters. Friedman, Are About three Nonetheless a crowd? Hodges, Decision (//isthreestillacrowdpolygamyandthelawafterobergefellvhodges (“Obergefell didn’t extremely open the doorway to plural marriages.”). Getting a long argument with the perhaps the to marry protects plural marriage ceremonies, examine Ronald C. Den Otter, Around three Might not be a crowd: The case getting a good Constitutional Straight to Plural ), that have John Witte, Jr., Why A couple of in one single Tissue? The latest West Instance getting Monogamy More Polygamy, 64 EMORY L.J. 1675 (2015).